Telnet to pmcmoo.org PostWebCulture (#13410) [Constantinople (#4136) ]

Message 121 on PostWebCulture (#13410):
Date:     Sun Mar  7 14:37:56 2004 EST
From:     oomwoo (#16136)
To:       PostWebCulture (#13410)
Subject:  
re: code change request


On Sun Mar  7 01:04:51 2004 EST Goat wrote :
> ok I understand kindof that publishing web pages without the players consent maybe wrong. If that is the reason the parent object is called if no www properties are set, then I have another idea.

Yea, there needs to be a simple convenient way to indicate consent to publication.  The current behavior is to show the first public "ancestor" . . . 

> To me calling the parent object looks like something is broken, like the programmer was a moron.

The idea was that the rendering of the first clear parent was as close as possible to the specialized object.  This would allow for a way to refer to moo objects, get a seamless rendering during design and implementation with no addition effort to get web rendering of the particular object once it was ready for PostWebCulture publication.

It is easy to see how that would be confusing . . . 

 - oom

The PostWebCulture project invites :

  "Systems designed to facilitate storage, transfer, and recall of sets of
   facts and relations augment the user's intelligence.  More sophisticated
   tools for graphic visualization of complex conversations or widespread 
   collaboration may allow certain types of intellectual feats previously
   thought impossible."

As this project moves forward, lifting our text into a more abductive realm, many theories will traverse the lifecycle of abstract concepts.

Directions: